Connaghan v. Caplice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the right to stop the work, tell the contractors to be careful, and change the way something [is] being done if [the defendant] felt something was unsafe” does not establish sufficient control for purposes of section 414
• stating that “[tjhe theory of recovery expressed in section 414 is based upon a master/servant relationship or respondeat superior”
• holding that “the right to stop the work, tell the contractors to be careful, and change the way something [is] being done if [the defendant] felt something was unsafe” does not establish sufficient control for purposes of section 414
• concluding that the deposition testimony that showed that the defendant had “the right to stop the work, tell the contractors to be careful, and change the way something was being done if he felt something was unsafe” did not establish sufficient control to trigger a duty under section 414
• “the right to stop the work, tell the contractors to be careful, and change the way something [is] being done if [the defendant] felt something was unsafe” does not establish sufficient retention of control for purposes of section 414
• “the right to stop the work, tell the contractors to be careful, and change the way something [is] being done if [the defendant] felt something was unsafe” does not establish sufficient retention of control for purposes of section 414

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).