Skip to main content
· 5/12/1896

Conn v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.

Citations

  • 66 Mo. App. 483
  • 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 92

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he appellate court must determine whether it would have been reasonably possible for the jury to return a verdict for the party opposing the motion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.