Conn v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even when subsection (b)(3)(B)(ix)(a)(4) is satisfied with clear and convincing evidence that parental rights have been involuntarily terminated as to a sibling, parental rights cannot be terminated unless there is also clear and convincing evidence pursuant to subsections (b
• holding that even when subsection (b)(3)(B)(ix)(a)(4) is satisfied with clear and convincing evidence that parental rights have been involuntarily terminated as to a sibling, parental rights cannot be terminated unless there is also clear and convincing evidence pursuant to subsections (b
• holding that even when subsection (b)(3)(B)(ix)(a)(4
• holding that even when subsection (b)(3)(B)(ix)(a)(4
• reversing where grounds were proved, but no evidence was presented to support the best-interest prong
• reversed TPR because it was solely based on prior involuntary termination of parents’ right to other child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).