Conlow v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no error in trial court's conclusion that obvious inconsistencies in State's case did not rise to level of perjury but presented question of credibility for jury
• holding no error in trial court’s conclusion that obvious inconsistencies in State’s case did not rise to level of peijury but presented question of credibility for jury
• trial court did not err as a matter of law or abuse its discretion in not requiring the State to elect between first degree intentional murder and first degree felony murder before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).