Conley v. Great Lakes Plastics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating trial court's determination of existence of \sufficient nexus between the objects sought and the place to be searched\ as conclusion of law
• treating trial court’s determination of existence of “sufficient nexus between the objects sought and the place to be searched” as conclusion of law
• affiant had knowledge that defendant was traveling from New York to “a specific location -- . . . ‘451 McKoy Street in Clinton, North Carolina’ -- . . . for the purpose of selling drugs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).