Conkey v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e generally do not address arguments omitted from an appellant’s statement of points on appeal.” (citing Gunderson v. Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks, 902 P.2d 323, 327 n.5 (Alaska 1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).