Conine v. Olympia Logging Co.
Citations
- 36 Wash. 345
- 78 P. 932
- 1904 Wash. LEXIS 560
Syllabus
<p>Master and Servant — Negligence—Failure to Provide Safe Method op Doing Business — Starting Logging Engine Without Warning — Complaint—Sufficiency. In an action for personal injuries sustained through the negligent starting of a logging engine without giving warning, the complaint is sufficient, as against a general demurrer, where it is alleged that the defendant’s donkey engine used for dragging logs with a cable was beyond the view of the men attaching the logs, that the defendant negligently failed to supply any appliance by which the engineer could signal to the men that he was about to start the engine, that it was customary and the defendant’s adopted method of doing business not to start the engine until the men had signalled to the engineer, and that the engineer negligently started the engine without waiting for such signal, or giving the plaintiff any notice, whereby the plaintiff, who was attaching the logs in his regular line of duty, was injured.</p>
Judges: Hadley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jock v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court· 1909-06-08· cited 21×
- Westerlund v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court· 1909-06-22· cited 16×
- Grim v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1906-03-03· cited 7×
- Berg v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1906-09-24· cited 7×
- Conine v. Olympia Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1906-02-28· cited 5×
- Keller v. White River Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-12-02· cited 3×
- Christensen v. HawleyWashington Supreme Court· 1910-12-02· cited 1×
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. VitelloColorado Court of Appeals· 1912-01-15
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooper v. MullinsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1860-03-15· cited 30×
- Hammarberg v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1898-06-22· cited 20×
- Brabon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1902-07-05· cited 18×
- Costa v. Pacific Coast Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1901-09-17· cited 11×
- Uren v. Golden Tunnel Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1901-03-13· cited 10×
- Bateman v. Peninsular Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1898-11-04· cited 3×
Other cases named Conine v. Olympia Logging Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.