Congdon v. Strine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “one-time threat” of eviction did not violate the Fair Housing Act’s anti-retaliation provisions when the defendant “took no further action to evict”
• entering summary judgment against FHAA discriminatory treatment claim based on a building’s repeated elevator failures because plaintiffs identified no evidence showing that defendant “acted differently in providing elevator services” to handicapped tenants
• “Even a perfect landlord cannot maintain a completely problem-free elevator. Elevators are subject to malfunctioning like all mechanical devices.”
• on a claim that building elevator not maintained, owner demonstrated that “he had a regular elevator maintenance contract” and had made other accommodations to claimant, thereby defeating the claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).