Skip to main content
· 2/7/1920

Congdon v. Knapp

Citations

  • 106 Kan. 206
  • 187 P. 660
  • 1920 Kan. LEXIS 486

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Hotel Commissioner — Food and, Drug Inspector — Both Offices Held by Same Person — Entitled to Statutory Salary of Each. One who holds two offices, the duties of which are not incompatible with each other, is entitled to the compensation fixed by law for both, and an agreement that he will perform the duties of either for less compensation than that fixed by law, is not valid.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “no prejudice resulted” from plaintiff’s counsel’s unsupported statement about how much the defendant earned annually because the jury’s award of damages was supported by the “plaintiff’s proof of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.