Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it now seems clear that plaintiffs allegation is that the IRS threatened that it would not conduct or- complete any investigation based on the information that plaintiff provided”
• “In the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, Congress added a new subsection (b
• “Rule 37(a)(5)(A) governs cases where a motion to compel is either granted in full or where the discovery sought in the motion is provided after the motion is filed.”
• “[UJnder RCFC 37(a)(5)(C) ... the award of expenses is discretionary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).