Skip to main content
· 7/15/1994

Confederated Salish Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation v. Mark Simonich

Citations

  • 29 F.3d 1398
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 9964
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5425
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17268
  • 1994 WL 364075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an order denying dismissal on Younger grounds is not immediately appealable on its own
  • holding that an order denying dismissal on Younger grounds is not immediately appealable on its own
  • holding that the district court did not err in refusing to abstain under Younger where the federal plaintiff, who was also the state-court plaintiff, did “not seek ... to restrain any ongoing state proceeding”
  • holding that the district court did not err in refusing to abstain under Younger where the federal plaintiff, who was also the state-court plaintiff, did \not seek . . . to restrain any ongoing state proceeding\
  • holding that the district court did not err in refusing to abstain under Younger where the federal plaintiff, who was also the state-court plaintiff did not seek to \restrain[ ] state proceedings or invalidat[e] a state law.\
  • noting that review of abstention after final judgment is not moot, even though the district court has already heard the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Hall, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.