Coney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 100 debt collection calls made over a five-month period was sufficient to present a jury question
• finding that the trial court did not commit error in restricting repetitious questions to the prospective jurors upon voir dire examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-11· cited 12×
• Desmond v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-19· cited 6×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-10· cited 3×
• Headings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-23· cited 2×
• Sally v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-03

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Huckaby v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-02-17· cited 34×
• Daniels v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-02-04· cited 27×
• Mizell v. New Kingsley Beach, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-07-12· cited 23×
• Barker v. Randolph
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-09-08· cited 19×
• Ernest Lee Grissom v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of Florida
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-05-20· cited 17×
• Dabney v. Yapa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-05-31· cited 15×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-12-07· cited 6×
• Gray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-01· cited 5×
• Beatty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-05-28· cited 2×