Skip to main content
· 9/10/1992

Conery v. Bath Associates

Citations

  • 803 F. Supp. 1388
  • 1992 WL 282151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that misappropriation of 20. The analogous provision governing private employers is set forth in the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (\COBRA\), 29 U.S.C. S 1161(a
  • finding that misappropriating company funds is gross misconduct
  • employer who prepared notice letter and placed in internal mail fulfilled notice requirement
  • deserting security post and falsifying log to earn extra paycheck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.