· 5/30/1972
Conerly v. Liptzen
Citations
- 199 N.W.2d 833
- 41 Mich. App. 238
- 64 A.L.R. 3d 943
- 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a premises possessor has a duty to “inspect the premises to discover possible dangerous conditions of which he does not know”
- stating that a premises possessor has a duty to “inspect the premises to discover possible dangerous conditions of which he does not know”
- stating that a premises possessor has a duty to “inspect the premises to discover possible dangerous conditions of which he does not know”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald, McGregor, O'Hara
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.