Cone v. Knight

Citations

• 52 Fla. 247

Syllabus

<p>1. Where the only errors urged before us are based upon the filing of a -praecipe for default by an attorney after his appointment and qualification as judge of the Circuit Court, in the absence of any proof to that effect, we can not assume that the attorney for the plaintiff and the judge of the Circuit Court were one and the same person.</p> <p>2. Even if a praecipe for default had been filed by plaintiff’s attorney after his appointment and qualification as Circuit judge, such action was purely ministerial, and, even if improper, would not of itself work a reversal of the judgment which was entered later upon the praecipe of other attorneys.</p>