Cone v. Cone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The exclusive possession should be for a specified period of time required for the purpose stated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Weisfeld v. Weisfeld
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-08· cited 16×
• Phillips v. Phillips
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-24· cited 2×
• Caffin v. Caffin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-21
• Ferguson v. Ferguson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Duncan v. Duncan
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-01-31· cited 161×
• Campbell v. Campbell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-02· cited 36×
• Coalla v. Coalla
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-21· cited 13×
• Delehant v. Delehant
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-23· cited 6×
• Baldi v. Baldi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-11-12· cited 6×
• Salyers v. Good
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-09· cited 5×
• Ambrose v. Rayne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-21· cited 2×