Condra v. Atlanta Orthopaedic Group P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the difference between the general medical standard of care and the personal treatment preferences of particular physicians, and reaffirming “the principle that a mere difference in views between physicians does not by itself prove malpractice”
• “Under the Daubert line of cases, the trial judge acts as the gatekeeper in determining the admissibility of expert opinion . . . ,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).