Skip to main content
· 8/24/1988

Condon v. Bank of California, N.A.

Citations

  • 759 P.2d 1137
  • 92 Or. App. 691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an absent beneficiary was not a necessary party under a state statute identical to Rule 19(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.