· 9/20/1982
Condo v. Mulcahy
Citations
- 88 A.D.2d 497
- 454 N.Y.S.2d 308
- 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that plaintiff was entitled to judicial accounting in view of fiduciary relationship between plaintiff and defendant
- allegations that the plaintiffs “relied on defendants’ expert advice . . . and entrusted them with their money” supported the existence of a fiduciary duty in the context of a commercial relationship
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lazer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.