Condliff v. Priest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing modification of arbitration award on the ground that the trial court abused its discretion by untimely altering the award
• the trial court had acted outside the permissible range of its discretion when it modified the judgment to allow Cite as 331 Or App 759 (2024) 765 the defendant “belatedly to assert a defense which was not timely raised” by the parties who appeared in the action
• the trial court had Cite as 331 Or App 759 (2024) 765 acted outside the permissible range of its discretion when it modified the judgment to allow the defendant “belatedly to assert a defense which was not timely raised” by the parties who appeared in the action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).