Concesionaria DHM, S.A. v. International Finance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “in deciding a motion to dismiss for improper venue, the court may examine facts outside the complaint to determine whether venue is proper” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that under New York law, “courts routinely dismiss a claim for breach of an implied covenant of good faith” when duplicative of a claim for express breach of the contract
• holding, on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(3
• finding venue appropriate in the Southern District of New York because, in part, “[t]he agreements primarily involve financial transactions that were designated to occur through New York City banks”
• quotingE.P.A. ex rel. McKeown v. Port Auth., 162 F.Supp.2d 173, 183 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)
• “[I]n deciding a motion to dismiss for improper venue, the court may examine facts outside the complaint to determine whether venue is proper.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).