· 12/8/2009
Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Watertown, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Citations
- 984 A.2d 72
- 118 Conn. App. 337
- 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[m]ere status ... as a party or a participant in a hearing before an administrative agency does not in and of itself constitute aggrievement for the purposes of appellate review” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- ‘‘con- clusory statements do not satisfy the appellant’s burden of proving aggrievement’’
- ‘‘conclusory statements do not sat- isfy the appellant’s burden of proving aggrievement’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gruendel, Harper, Pellegrino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.