Skip to main content
· 12/8/2009

Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Watertown, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Citations

  • 984 A.2d 72
  • 118 Conn. App. 337
  • 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[m]ere status ... as a party or a participant in a hearing before an administrative agency does not in and of itself constitute aggrievement for the purposes of appellate review” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • ‘‘con- clusory statements do not satisfy the appellant’s burden of proving aggrievement’’
  • ‘‘conclusory statements do not sat- isfy the appellant’s burden of proving aggrievement’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gruendel, Harper, Pellegrino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.