Concept Capital Corp. v. DeKalb County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that although MARTA “did not presently need the air rights to construct a ground level parking lot, ... it might at some time in the future sell or lease the air rights to developers to generate revenues”
• “[cjourts must not substitute their judgment for that of the condemning authority — neither as to the quantum of the interest to be condemned, nor the location or the quantum of land to be acquired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).