Skip to main content
· 6/5/1988

Concepcion v. Veb Backereimaschenbau Halle

Citations

  • 120 F.R.D. 482
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5127
  • 1988 WL 55020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the purpose of discovery as providing “parties with information essential to the proper litigation of all relevant facts, to eliminate surprise, and to promote settlement.” (citing Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 341 (1978)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.