Conatser v. Clarksville Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that plaintiff was fired three weeks after receiving workers’ compensation was not sufficient evidence of a causal relationship
• holding that the fact that plaintiff was fired three weeks after receiving workers' compensation was not sufficient evidence of a causal relationship
• finding that a three-week time period between the plaintiff receiving workers’ compensation benefits and his termination was sufficient to show causation
• termination allowed if employee is not physically able to do the work required by the job
• dismissal three days after returning to work from injury recuperation was insufficient to show causal connection
• in rejecting common law retaliatory discharge claim based on plaintiffs discharge three days after filing a workers’ compensation claim, the Court found plaintiff could not establish causation by relying solely on temporal proximity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).