Conagra, Inc. v. Nierenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that oral responses to aggressive examination by trained lawyers will not be construed as a judicial admission
• holding that oral responses to aggressive examination by trained lawyers will not be construed as a judicial admission
• ―The truth of the case depends on a comparison of what all the witnesses say and all the circumstances indicate. A rule which binds a party to a particular statement uttered on the stand becomes an artificial rule. It is out of place in dealing with testimony.‖ (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).