Comrey v. Discover Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing hostile work environment claim because the plaintiff failed to plead a causal connection between his protected status and the alleged hostile work environment
• dismissing the plaintiff’s employment discrimination claim because she had failed to contend, unlike in the instant case, that her comparator(s) were similarly situated to herself
• dismissing a Title VII claim where an allegedly discriminatory comment was “far removed in time” and “tangential . . . to the Plaintiff's ultimate discharge”
• describing a claim of being singled out as worthy of dismissal where “there were no allegations to suggest that the [act] … constituted ridicule or insult”
• “The fact that the [p]laintiff was the only Filipino in his office is not sufficient to connect the [d]efendants’ actions and behavior to a discriminatory intent.”
• “Without any further facts, defendant’s statements, while politically incorrect, do not raise a plausible inference that his actions towards the [plaintiffs] were a result of [their] membership in a protected class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).