Skip to main content
· 10/10/1980

Computer Print Systems, Inc. v. Lewis

Citations

  • 422 A.2d 148
  • 281 Pa. Super. 240
  • 212 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 626
  • 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing, inter alia, whether computer programs were type of property which would qualify as trade secrets
  • noting concept of developing programs to expedite direct mail advertising was not a trade secret because it is public knowledge, but specific programs to implement the concept were trade secrets
  • mere acquisition of computer programs through breach of duty of confidentiality creates liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Gates, Dowling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.