· 10/10/1980
Computer Print Systems, Inc. v. Lewis
Citations
- 422 A.2d 148
- 281 Pa. Super. 240
- 212 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 626
- 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing, inter alia, whether computer programs were type of property which would qualify as trade secrets
- noting concept of developing programs to expedite direct mail advertising was not a trade secret because it is public knowledge, but specific programs to implement the concept were trade secrets
- mere acquisition of computer programs through breach of duty of confidentiality creates liability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price, Gates, Dowling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.