Skip to main content
· 11/12/1982

Federal Case

Citations

  • 693 F.2d 198
  • 224 U.S. App. D.C. 83
  • 8 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2457
  • 52 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1021
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting and upholding Commission's Computer II \finding that enhanced services . . . are not common carrier services within the scope of Title II\
  • noting and upholding Commission’s Computer II “finding that enhanced services... are not common carrier services within the scope of Title II”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.