Comptroller of Treasury v. Martin G. Imbach, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he Bill File indicates that the [General Assembly] . . . considered this section a mere statutory codification of Comptroller[’s] Rule 64” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).