Skip to main content
· 1/29/2014

Comptroller of the Treasury v. Immanuel

Citations

  • 216 Md. App. 259
  • 85 A.3d 878
  • 2014 WL 351950
  • 2014 Md. App. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hypothesizing the only functional difference between a request for physical documents and data “is that IT professionals would perform here the work that clerical professionals would perform on a paper file”
  • “Immanuel should emerge on remand with a list of claims that tracks the Comptroller's disclosure obligations under the Abandoned Property Act.”
  • “The [PIA] grants the public the right to inspect public records in a way that favors public access.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nazarian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.