Skip to main content
· 11/17/1950

Compton v. Runyon

Citations

  • 314 Ky. 65
  • 234 S.W.2d 301
  • 1950 Ky. LEXIS 1026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that arbitration agreements in expired contracts do not represent an exception to the principle that courts should respect clear and unmistakable delegations of arbitrability questions to arbitrators
  • “The court adopts the consensus view. By incorporating the AAA’s Rules, the [agreement’s] arbitration clause clearly and unmistakably delegates authority to the arbitrators to decide whether Allscript’s claims are arbitrable.”
  • “But that is just a presumption; the Supreme Court has held that a ‘clear[ ] and unmistakabl[e]’ agreement between the parties that the arbitrators will resolve disputes about arbitrability is as binding as any other arbitration agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.