Compton v. Rudolph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the district court’s denial of a motion to compel filed two weeks prior to trial after more than four years of discovery
• “Plaintiffs essentially claim that [defendant] should have written off its bad investment sooner-but that is not fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).