Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in order to collect under the Workers’ Compensation Law, claimant “has the burden of proving that he is so disabled”
• in order to collect under the Workers' Compensation Law, claimant \has the burden of proving that he is so disabled\
• “[T]he burden of proof is upon the proponent of a fact or position, the party who would be unsuccessful if no evidence were introduced on either side.”
• “The general rule is that the burden of proof is upon the proponent of a fact or position, the party who would be unsuccessful if no evidence were introduced on either side.”
• real estate investment earnings did not bear on employability and could not terminate disability award despite fact that such income might exceed wages earned by claimant at former job prior to his disabling injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).