Skip to main content
· 5/23/1853

Comparet v. Randall

Citations

  • 4 Ind. 55
  • 1853 Ind. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining two-year timeframe was \clearly within the accepted range for the duration of post- employment restraints\ without reference to the district court's decision
  • protectable interest in customer contacts and relationships

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.