Supreme Court of Delaware· 10/4/1993
Compaq Computer Corp. v. Horton
Citations
- 631 A.2d 1
- 1993 Del. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Section 220 may be employed by a stockholder investigating a direct claim just as readily as when the stockholder is investigating a derivative claim
- allowing Section 220 claims to proceed for the purpose of soliciting other stockholders to participate in class action litigation against the defendant corporation
- ‘‘[m]any cases recognize a [shareholder’s] right to investigate past acts of mismanagement’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horsey, Moore, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-12-23· cited 768×
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-04-11· cited 233×
- Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting & Development Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1997-01-14· cited 112×
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1996-08-02· cited 93×
- Highland Select Equity Fund, L.P. v. Motient Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-07-06· cited 29×
- Shaw v. Agri-Mark, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-08-02· cited 20×
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Leviton Mfg. Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1995-12-19· cited 18×
- Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. BlumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-08-07· cited 8×
- Benjamin v. Island Management, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-11-02· cited 4×
- Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1995-12-19· cited 1×
- Mark Lavin v. West CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2017-12-29
- KT4 Partners LLC v. Palantir Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2018-02-22
- Obeid v. Gemini Real Estate Advisors, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2018-06-05
- Senetas Corporation, Ltd. v. DeepRadiology CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2019-07-30
- James Wei and Yanxin Zhang v. Zoox, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2022-01-31
- Domenech Fernández v. Integration Corporate Services, PSCSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2013-12-03
- Herger Pacheco v. Calidad de Vida Vecinal, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2014-05-28
- Miranda Aviles, Arnaldo v. Ae Medical Technologies, Inc.Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico· 2024-04-30
- Asaf Barkan v. Exabeam, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2025-04-11
- In Re Quintiles Transnational Corp. S'holders Litig.North Carolina Business Court· 2003-12-19
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Oberly v. KirbySupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-06-04· cited 89×
- CM & M GROUP, INC. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Delaware· 1982-09-15· cited 84×
- Skouras v. Admiralty Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1978-04-03· cited 61×
- Skoglund v. Ormand Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1976-12-03· cited 60×
- General Time Corporation v. Talley Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1968-04-04· cited 36×
- Baker v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1950-03-02· cited 24×
- Nodana Petroleum Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1956-06-14· cited 19×
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. KerkorianSupreme Court of Delaware· 1969-05-27· cited 19×
- Mite Corporation v. Heli-Coil CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1969-08-18· cited 17×
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. PorterieSupreme Court of Delaware· 1962-07-10· cited 15×
- Loew's Theatres, Inc. v. Commercial Credit CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1968-06-10· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.