Companion v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, when defendant does not brief separately claim under Connecticut constitution, we limit our review to United States constitution
• noting that, when defendant does not brief claims under Connecticut constitution separately, we limit our review to United States constitution
• recognizing, in dictum, that statute may be so overinclusive or underinclusive that it does not rationally advance legislative purpose
• discussing, as part of equal protection claim analysis, whether defendant raised claim that statute is underinclusive or overinclusive
• presence of two uniformed officers seated behind defendant did not prejudice him such that mistrial should have been granted
• under capital felony statute, General Statutes § 53a-54b [8], accessory need not be aware of victim’s age while acting with intent requisite for murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).