Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S. A. v. Schenley Distillers Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appeal could not be barred by claim preclusion based on a judgment that post-dated the judgment on appeal
• stating that new facts in a plaintiff's 19 opposition papers can be considered by courts in deciding whether to grant leave to amend
• “[Unsubstantiated versions of events proffered by counsel on appeal are, of course, not evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).