Compania Azucarera Cubana v. Ingraham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• compelling disclosure of information for “those experts who will not be called at trial but who have been retained by plaintiffs”
• finding “no authority” to compel disclosure “with regard to experts who were not retained or specially employed” but compelling disclosure of the identity “as to those experts who will not be called at trial but who have been retained by plaintiffs”
• in securities action, plaintiff’s tax returns for previous seven years were discoverable as relevant to issue of whether plaintiff gave broker accurate information
• production ordered even though defendant had copies in his own files

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).