Skip to main content
· 12/21/1994

Community Telecommunications Corp. v. Loughran

Citations

  • 651 A.2d 373
  • 1994 Me. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that inclusion of commissions as wages under statute aligns with protective purpose of the act and \with authority from several other jurisdictions\
  • holding that inclusion of commissions as wages under statute aligns with protective purpose of the act and “with authority from several other jurisdictions”
  • holding that section 626 was intended to provide a \broad guarantee ofprompt payment of wages\ and that commissions and bonuses constitute \wages\ under the statute
  • holding that section 626 was intended to provide a \broad guarantee of prompt payment of wages\ and that commissions and bonuses constitute \wages\ under the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Rudman, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.