Community Nutrition Institute v. John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rulemaking proceedings would never end if an agency’s response to comments must always be made the subject of additional comments”
• refusing to accord preclusive effect to determination made in granting of preliminary injunction in final hearing on the merits in a different case
• “Rulemaking proceedings would never end if an agency’s response to comments must always be made the subject of additional comments.”
• no violation of notice and comment requirements when unavailable supplemental studies were a response to comments which discussed a methodological flaw in prior studies
• no prejudice from agency’s response to comments in form of “new scientific studies” where petitioners did “not even suggest that the new studies were defective”
• no violation of notice and comment requirements when unavailable supplemental studies were a response to comments which discussed a methodological flaw in prior studies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).