Skip to main content
· 2/8/1988

Community Development Commission v. Shuffler

Citations

  • 198 Cal. App. 3d 450
  • 243 Cal. Rptr. 719
  • 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court had jurisdiction, pursuant to a similarly worded statute, to consider a notice of abandonment and motion to set aside that notice, despite the pendency of an appeal in the subject eminent domain proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.