Skip to main content
· 3/23/2000

Community Credit Union v. Conte (In Re Conte)

Citations

  • 206 F.3d 536
  • 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 298
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 4631
  • 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Consistent with the parol evidence rule, it is this written objective evidence of intent ... that controls our analysis.”
  • “[I]t is [the] written objective evidence of intent, not the parties’ subjective understandings, that controls our analysis”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Duhé, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.