Community Bank v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that preservation of policies established by the Uniform Commercial Code foreclosed application of equitable defense of estoppel based on the plaintiffs failure to supervise inventory in which it had a security interest
• creditor not estopped from asserting his rights under a security agreement because he did not supervise debtor’s inventory
• even though issue was not cross-appealed, “in determining the proper scope of our review, we must, as a preliminary matter, determine whether this lawsuit is one at law or in equity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).