Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Congress did not intend, in enacting the notice requirement,\to unduly burden citizens by requiring them to basically carry out the job of the [environmental enforcement] agenc[ies]\
• noting that in requiring pre-suit notice, “Congress did not intend to unduly burden citizens by requiring them to basically carry out the job of the agency”
• “Neither the CWA nor the EPA’s regulations require plaintiffs to provide an exhaustive list of all violations.”
• drain received water from the Yakima River, and discharged water \either directly or by connecting waterways into the Yakima River.\
• “[F]ields where manure is stored and ditches therein are part of the CAFO and thus, point sources”
• notice with a range of dates was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).