Skip to main content
· 10/29/1973

Communications Satellite Corp. v. Shannon

Citations

  • 414 U.S. 989
  • 94 S. Ct. 302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Missouri and Illinois are not liable for judgments against Bi-State, there is no policy reason for extending the states’ sovereign immunity to Bi-State.”
  • agency exercising state power as an arm of the compacting state is not “person” subject to § 1983 suit
  • agency exercising state power as an arm of the compacting state is not “person” subject to § 1983 suit
  • agency exercising state power as an arm of the compacting state -6- is not “person” subject to § 1983 suit
  • agency exercising state power as an arm of the compacting state is not “person” subject to § 1983 suit
  • an agency exercising state power is not a person subject to suit under § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.