Communications Group, Inc. v. GTE Mobilnet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that plaintiffs inability to show how defendants would benefit from fraud is “noteworthy” in determining whether a jury could find fraudulent intent.
• “We are unaware of any evidence, and plaintiffs have directed us to none, from which a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that defendants promised to offer plaintiffs a contract, but never intended to perform the promise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).