Skip to main content
· 7/23/2004

Communications & Control, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Citations

  • 374 F.3d 1329
  • 362 U.S. App. D.C. 504
  • 33 Communications Reg. (P&F) 344
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an agency’s unexplained departure from its longstanding practice is arbitrary and capricious
  • “[D]eparture from [past] practice, with no explanation, renders its void ab initio rationale arbitrary and capricious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.