Commscope, Inc. v. Commscope (U.S.A.) International Group Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Arizona UTSA does not define \willful and malicious\ but adopting Pennsylvania's definition, explaining \the Court considers as instructive decisions from other jurisdictions that have adopted substantially the same provision of the UTSA\
• finding hourly rates 12 ranging from $325–$450 per hour reasonable for intellectual property attorneys in the 13 Phoenix area
• finding case exceptional where 3 defendant “did not defend this action, and the allegations in the Complaint, admitted on 4 [defendant’s] default, reflect that his misconduct was willful and malicious.”
• allegations that secrets were password protected and accessible only to certain employees sufficient
• dismissing unfair competition claim based on preemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).