Commonwealth v. Zingarelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the police’s conduct in providing an opportunity without attempting to overcome appellant’s reason does not rise to level of outrageousness necessary to find entrapment as matter of law
• appellant’s claim waived on appeal where his Rule 1925(b) statement was not timely filed and the trial court did not address the claim in its opinion
• where police use internet sting operation and pose as a 15-year-old, they merely provide defendant with an opportunity to commit a crime and do not engage in egregious behavior that would constitute entrapment
• where police use internet sting operation and pose as a 15-year-old, they merely provide defendant with an opportunity to commit a crime and do not engage in egregious behavior that would constitute entrapment
• defendant committed crime of attempt of IDSI and statutory sexual assault where he made following substantial steps: (1) made hotel reservation pursuant to conversation with undercover officer posing as young girl; (2) packed an overnight bag; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).